RAM

• If you see a TwinMos, grab it! - Dan Druff -[11/1/2001 2:49:22 PM (GMT+0)]
  • Oh please - MS -[11/1/2001 5:58:14 PM (GMT+0)]
    • Why gimmick when the result is not? - Dan Druff -[11/2/2001 4:29:18 AM (GMT+0)]
      • Re: Why gimmick when the result is not? - MS -[11/2/2001 3:33:48 PM (GMT+0)]
        • You guys are just great! - Dan Druff -[11/2/2001 6:24:18 PM (GMT+0)]
          • no worries - MS -[11/2/2001 9:56:55 PM (GMT+0)]
  • Good stuff - LED -[11/1/2001 3:36:17 PM (GMT+0)]
    • So Kingmax any good?... - Celstk855 -[11/2/2001 9:12:43 PM (GMT+0)]
      • Re: So Kingmax any good?... - LED -[11/2/2001 10:20:08 PM (GMT+0)]
  • If you see marketing gimmicks, question them - ludicrous -[11/1/2001 3:31:34 PM (GMT+0)]
    • But how do you know a review is biased or a marketing gimmick? - Dan Druff -[11/2/2001 3:07:54 AM (GMT+0)]
      • Re: But how do you know a review is biased or a marketing gimmick? - ludicrous -[11/2/2001 6:06:35 AM (GMT+0)]
        • Excellent summary - Dan Druff -[11/2/2001 2:15:37 PM (GMT+0)]
          • Cheerio :-) nt - ludicrous -[11/2/2001 4:54:48 PM (GMT+0)]
    • what FSB? (nt) - tide -[11/1/2001 5:15:55 PM (GMT+0)]
      • So far - ludicrous -[11/1/2001 6:24:25 PM (GMT+0)]
        • so... - tide -[11/1/2001 6:40:36 PM (GMT+0)]
          • VisionTek GeForce2MX (the original) at 200MHz core and 200MHz memory (nt) - ludicrous -[11/1/2001 7:24:46 PM (GMT+0)]
            • needs to be upgraded :-) (nt) - tide -[11/1/2001 8:01:20 PM (GMT+0)]
              • yes it does - ludicrous -[11/1/2001 11:39:30 PM (GMT+0)]
                • Not bad for $270 though.....{nt} - Celstk855 -[11/2/2001 9:22:00 PM (GMT+0)]
    • hmmm - ludicrous -[11/1/2001 5:05:43 PM (GMT+0)]
• Re: RAM - LED -[11/1/2001 6:47:23 AM (GMT+0)]

Post a Followup