Why gimmick when the result is not?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CPU-Central Message Board ] [ Home ]

Subject: Why gimmick when the result is not?
Name: Dan Druff
Date: 11/1/2001 9:29:18 PM (GMT-7)
IP Address: 208.181.26.131
In Reply to: Oh please posted by MS
Message:

Thanks for the article about DDR. Reading the
results of the graph: at 2:2:2:/1T, the corsair
XMS 2400 is better. At 2:3:3/1T, the Corsair XMS(samsung) is 163 is also better. At 2:5:3:3/2T,
they are all the same. Even the Corsair XMS 2400
is better than the Infineon.

If the result shows better performance, then why
is it a gimmick? Am I reading the results the
other way around? Very confused.

Dan DRuff

[ View FollowUps | Post Followup | E-Mail Sender | Main ]



Follow Ups:



Maximum of 100 messages displayed.

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload some images for this post


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CPU-Central Message Board ]